Friday, October 15, 2004

Jon Stewart on Crossfire
Rips them a new asshole. As soon as the dude on Overspun gets it on his site, I'll link to it. It is AWESOME! I can't believe all the shit he said. He let loose. I know, horrible for me to write about this without something to show you, but I couldn't wait.
From my memory:

Tucker Carlson to Jon Stewart "I do think you're more funny on your show"

Jon Stewart: "You know what's interesting though, you're as big a dick on this show as you are on any show"

Update: Transcript here
Jon Stewart Bitchslaps CNN's 'Crossfire' Show
In what could well be the strangest and most refreshing media moment of the election season, "The Daily Show" host Jon Stewart turned up on a live broadcast of CNN's "Crossfire" Friday and accused the mainstream media — and his hosts in particular — of being soft and failing to do their duty as journalists to keep politicians and the political process honest.

Reaching well outside his usual youthful "Daily Show" demo, Stewart took to "Crossfire" to promote his new book, "America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction" (see "Jon Stewart Writes A History Textbook That — At Last! — Features Nudity"), but instead of pushing the tome, Stewart used his time to verbally slap the network and the media for being "dishonest" and "doing a disservice" to the American public. After co-host Tucker Carlson suggested that Stewart went easy on Senator John Kerry when the candidate was a guest on "The Daily Show," Stewart unloaded on "Crossfire," calling hosts Carlson and Paul Begala "partisan hacks" and chiding them for not raising the level of discourse on their show beyond sloganeering.

"What you do is not honest. What you do is partisan hackery," Stewart said. "You have a responsibility to the public discourse, and you fail miserably.

"I watch your show every day, and it kills me. It's so painful to watch," Stewart added as it became apparent that the comedian was not joking. He went on to hammer the network, and the media in general, for its coverage of the presidential debates. Stewart said it was a disservice to viewers to immediately seek reaction from campaign insiders and presidential cheerleaders following the debates, noting that the debates' famed "Spin Alley" should be called "Deception Lane."

"The thing is, we need your help," Stewart said. "Right now, you're helping the politicians and the corporations and we're left out there to mow our lawns."

While the audience seemed to be behind Stewart, Begala and Carlson were both taken aback. The hosts tried to feed Stewart set-up lines hoping to draw him into a more light-hearted shtick, but Stewart stayed on point and hammered away at the show, the hosts, and the state of political journalism. Carlson grew increasingly frustrated, at first noting that the segment wasn't "funny," and later verbally sparring with the comedian.

"You're not very much fun," Carlson said. "Do you like lecture people like this, or do you come over to their house and sit and lecture them; they're not doing the right thing, that they're missing their opportunities, evading their responsibilities?"

"If I think they are," Stewart retorted.

The conversation reached its most heated moment when Carlson said to Stewart, "I do think you're more fun on your show," to which Stewart replied, "You're as big a dick on your show as you are on any show."

"That went great," Stewart could be heard sarcastically saying as the show went off the air (a transcript of the show is available on CNN.com).

In an era when the media is increasingly fragmented and viewers can surround themselves with programming that falls right in line with their own views, be they on the right or the left, Stewart's blast seemed especially on point. It seems fitting that the tirade came on a day when much of the media attention focused on the presidential race was directed at the mention of Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter during the last presidential debate, as opposed to the issues addressed at that debate.



Why Kerry Must Win #18
caption contest countdown


Thursday, October 14, 2004

Un-fucking-believable

Being the sole female on the Ludis staff I had to bring this up. Once again, the Bushies have disregarded the international community. What was that last night about respecting women?

250 countries sign women's rights plan
More than 250 countries, including India, have asked the United Nations to help promote women's right to education, healthcare, reproductive health and family planning, but the Bush administration declined to join the demand, objecting to a reference to 'sexual rights', a term which it says does not have any agreed definition.
Why Kerry Must Win #19
caption contest countdown



Wednesday, October 13, 2004

Let's see how this factors in

Aw shit.

OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies. Below you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible page-turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters. Based on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG will point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation.

Why Kerry Must Win #20
caption contest countdowny Must Win #20


Thanks to Jeff Hardison for this dandy.

Tuesday, October 12, 2004

The Constitution recognizes rights, it doesn't give them

A fantastic historical article submitted to Buzzflash that details the modern erosion of the founding fathers' vision of constitutional rights. So much so, that many of the Fathers didn't even want to include a Bill of Rights, because these rights were so obvious to everyone....Jefferson, Madison and Hamilton's arguments about future generations forgetting or "foolishly electing" tyrannical leaders, is downright scary in their accuracy of foresight.

some excerpts (but you really should read the whole thing):

In an eerie juxtaposition during the second presidential debate, both George W. Bush and Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia - each in their own sort of code - were saying at the same time that if Bush is elected in 2004, women who get abortions will probably face criminal prosecutions, and our rights of privacy will evaporate.

In a bizarre re-writing of American history, Scalia advocated the new conservative doctrine he calls "originalism," to which he and Associate Justice Clarence Thomas subscribe. According to Scalia and Thomas, the government gives us rights. And, they say, if rights weren't explicitly written into the Constitution, they don't exist.

As the AP article noted: "Abortion, gay rights and the 'right to die' are best left to the legislative and executive branches, he [Scalia] said. 'You want a right to abortion? ... Pass a law.'"

In his belief that we get our rights from our government, Scalia is more closely following the logic of dictators and theocrats than of Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton.

Until Scalia and Thomas came along, modern Supreme Court justices generally understood that we don't get our rights from laws. Civil and human rights don't even come from the Constitution - as the Declaration of Independence notes, they pre-existed it.

in the minds of the Founders, we are born with rights by the simple fact of existence, as identified by John Locke and others in the 1600s, and written by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence in 1776. "We hold these truths to be self-evident," Jefferson wrote. Humans are "endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights...." These rights are clear and obvious, the Founders repeatedly said. They belong to us from birth, as opposed to something the Constitution - or Scalia, or any government - can hand to us.

Thomas Jefferson, however, foreseeing a time when the concepts fundamental to the founding of America were forgotten by people like Scalia, Thomas, and Bush, began to agitate for at least a rudimentary statement of rights as amendments to the Constitution, laying out those main areas where government could, at the minimum, never intrude into our lives.

The Constitution doesn't grant rights - it acknowledges that We The People are the sole holders of rights. We don't need to "pass a law" to have rights.

Yet despite all the documentary evidence - from the Declaration of Independence, to the Federalist Papers, to the Constitution's own Preamble, to the letters of our nations Founders and Framers - Scalia continues to insist that we only have rights if he can find them written down in the Constitution.

With no right to privacy, Roe v. Wade would be overturned, and PATRIOT Act provisions wouldn't infringe on a non-existent right.




Why Kerry Must Win #21
caption contest countdown



Monday, October 11, 2004

Why Kerry Must Win #22
caption contest countdown



Saturday, October 09, 2004

My thoughts exactly...

AGREE WITH US OR BURN IN HELL
I don't know how many of you have started sifting through our Voters' Pamphlet, but if you have, you were probably as shocked as I was when reading the first 3 arguments in favor Measure 36 (ammendment banning gay marriage). Here are some of my favorites. Remember-these are arguments in FAVOR of 36!

Highlights from the first: Culture War
In the Holy Bible, Saint Paul says that Christians should remain single and abstain from sex. The New Testament says that people should get married only if they are too weak-willed to abstain from sex:

Marriage is not sacred. Marriage is for wimps and sissies!

Oregon public policy should define marriage in accordance with divinely inspired Scripture. Therefore, marriage licenses should be granted only to those persons who have been certified by professional psychiatric examination to be too weak-willed to abstain from sex.Oh, by the way, although Jesus never said a single word condemn homosexuality, if heterosexuals can't get married, homosexuals should not be allowed to marry either -- well, unless they'e too week willed to abstain. Sissies!
(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, Traditional Prejudices Coalition.)

Highlights from the second: Marriage is Sacred
Marriage is for procreation. If you're not pro-Creation, you're anti-God. And once a marriage has been solemnized, sex is serious business. The solemnity of sex must not be abused for sinful pleasures. Sex is for procreation, not recreation. And marriage is for breeding purposes.

Therefore, it should be Oregon public policy that
    • Homosexuals may not marry.
    • Infertile persons may not marry.
    • Men with vasectomies may not marry.
    • Women with hysterectomies may not marry.
    • Post-menopausal women may not marry.
    • Persons planning to use birth control may not marry.
    • Non-virgins may not marry (Deuteronomy 22:13-21).
    • Inter-racial couples may not marry (Deuteronomy 7:3).

And couples who fail to conceive within two years ought to have their marriage licenses revoked.

Additionally, the Bible says that

    • Divorced persons may not marry (Luke 16:18).
    • And if a man dies without leaving a male heir, it is his brother's responsibility to impregnate the widow (Genesis 38:6-10). If he refuses, he shall be fined one shoe (Deuteronomy 25:5-10).

Love is not good enough a reason to marry, because marriage is only for
HETEROSEXUALBREEDING.COM

(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, Defense of Heterosexual Breeding Coalition.)


Highlights from the third: THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY IS UNDER ATTACK!
First there was Original Sin when Eve disobeyed God! Then the Flood! Then Abraham abandoned the traditional practice of human sacrifice! Then Jews instituted the modern covenant of circumcision! Then Moses brought down from Mount Sinai a bunch of new-fangled Laws on stone tablets! And later Jesus abolished them and preached instead the radical new Golden Rule!

Polygamy fell out of favor! Women were no longer mere pieces of property belonging to men! Next these uppity women demanded the right to vote! Families could no longer own slaves! Prohibition saved the family from destruction by Demon Rum! The nineteenth-century extended families on American farms were destroyed by the 1950s social engineering of the "Leave It to Beaver" suburban cookie-cutter nuclear families! Blacks refused to ride in the back of the bus! Women demanded equal pay for equal work! Single parents demanded respect! Gays and lesbians demanded an end to hatred and oppression! Flower children protested traditional mass-murder warfare and genocide! Divorce skyrocketed! The silence surrounding child abuse was broken!

My friends, there is a simple answer. All you have to do is
VOTE TO TURN THE CLOCK BACK!

It's really that simple!

Now, which one of these radical social changes will this measure turn the clock back to? Oh, come on, let's just
LEAVE IT TO BEAVER!

(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, The Beaver State Defense of Beaver Coalition.)

(All of these can be found here)

So, yes, of course these are obviously a farce to point out the idiocy of the ban, but what strikes me is that they are the first three in the pamphlet. When people flip through their pamphlets, these are the first 3 they read in FAVOR of gay marriage. What a great move! We did some research and according to the secretary of states office they simply print them in the order they receive them. This M. Dennis Moore guy has his shit together! I have to say, I am THOROUGHLY impressed by this dude. We tried to find out more about him and we found a couple of articles saying how pissed off the pro -36 people are over this, but all they say about Mr. Moore is that he is a "Portland freelance book editor and church organist. He said he's simply using satire, "a very ancient literary device to ridicule hypocrisy."

What's even better is that he did this is 2000 as well for measure 9. One of those starts out "Lon is too liberal."

I don't know who this guy is, but man, he knows how to use the system to his advantage. Nice work!!!!!! And seriously, the Beaver State Defense of Beaver Coalition????? Classic.



Friday, October 08, 2004

Friday MickBlogging
Why Kerry Must Win #25
caption contest countdown



Thursday, October 07, 2004

Why Kerry Must Win #26
caption contest countdown



Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot... with a small Johnson

Link:
Black said Limbaugh had extra incentive to fight the ruling because the seized records contained embarrassing details -- unrelated to the investigation -- about procedures and surgeries performed on ''intimate parts'' of his anatomy.

Wednesday, October 06, 2004

Why Kerry Must Win #27
caption contest countdown


Tuesday, October 05, 2004

Why Kerry Must Win #28
caption contest countdown